| 
						Mr Howard suggested that 
						Mr Abbott replace him with Malcolm Turnbull to 
						reinvigorate the government and its economic narrative.
						
						 
						Mr Abbott rejected the 
						advice of his mentor. 
						 
						Mr Howard and Mr Costello 
						– the duo that won the 1998 election campaigning for a 
						GST – gave their advice to Mr Abbott separately but were 
						united in the need for a new treasurer. 
						 
						Mr Abbott was wary of Mr 
						Turnbull's ambitions: "Turnbull doesn't want to be 
						treasurer, he wants to be prime minister," was an Abbott 
						phrase. Scott Morrison was another option, but Mr Abbott 
						thought his loyalty suspect too. 
						 
						Mr Abbott only decided to, 
						in effect, offer the job to Mr Morrison in a desperate 
						last gambit to save the government. 
						 
						The Hockey tax plan was 
						considered highly sensitive and did not go before the 
						Abbott cabinet for debate. 
						 
						The prime minister was 
						interested in the plan but non-committal, the sources 
						said. 
						 
						"At a minimum," Mr Abbott 
						told Fairfax Media, "we would have had modest tax cuts 
						based on spending restraints. 
						 
						"There were options for 
						more radical reform, but whether we would have plumped 
						for one or another would have depended on developments 
						over the next few months, including what sort of 
						cooperation we were going to get from the states."
						
						 
						Mr Hockey's proposal was 
						designed to tax consumption more but to tax income less, 
						the same essential concept as the Howard-Costello GST-based 
						reform. 
						 
						The extra GST, worth 
						around $40 billion a year after it had been phased in 
						over two to four years according to the sources, was to 
						fund cuts to income taxes and company taxes, and pay 
						compensation to low income earners. 
						 
						The Hockey plan did not 
						propose to expand the GST coverage beyond the existing 
						tax base, so it would not apply to fresh food, 
						education, health or financial services, the sources 
						said. 
						 
						This was because of the 
						complexities in taxing financial services, and because 
						of problems of fairness in taxing the other items.
						
						 
						Shirtfronted also reveals 
						who proposed the controversial measures that became the 
						hallmarks of the 2014 budget. 
						 
						That budget was the 
						threshold for the Abbott government's standing in the 
						polls. Until the budget, the government was consistently 
						ahead. Afterwards, it went permanently into a losing 
						position. 
						
							
						
						
						
						Source:
						The Sydney Morning Herald, dated 02/12/2015. |